Reviewing
To provide a high quality and a variety rich program the ISSW 2018 applies a transparent review and scheduling process.
The short abstract review will be carried out as double blind peer-review (reviewers can only view content, author's names are omitted) according to the following criteria:
- originality and innovation
- relevance
- quality
- level of "Merging of theory and practice"
The final scheduling (assignment to oral/poster presentation and in General or Special Topic) criteria are:
- author's preferences
- review ranking
- balance of science and practice
- balance of national and international contributions