Reviewing

To provide a high quality and a variety rich program the ISSW 2018 applies a transparent review and scheduling process.

The short abstract review will be carried out as double blind peer-review (reviewers can only view content, author's names are omitted) according to the following criteria:

  - originality and innovation

  - relevance

  - quality

  - level of "Merging of theory and practice"

 

The final scheduling (assignment to oral/poster presentation and in General or Special Topic) criteria are:

  - author's preferences

  - review ranking

  - balance of science and practice

  - balance of national and international contributions

 

 

 

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information