Reviewing

To provide a high quality and a variety rich program the ISSW 2018 applies a transparent review and scheduling process.

The short abstract review will be carried out as double blind peer-review (reviewers can only view content, author's names are omitted) according to the following criteria:

  - originality and innovation

  - relevance

  - quality

  - level of "Merging of theory and practice"

The final scheduling (assignment to oral/poster presentation and in General or Special Topic) criteria are:

  - author's preferences

  - review ranking

  - balance of science and practice

  - balance of national and international contributions